| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear EC members,
The below email ballot closes 2PMedt 03Sept 2004. The tentative tally for the below motion is 06 Approve
02 Disapprove 07 Did Not Vote 00 Abstains I suggest that Bob Grow's and Bob O'Hara's
comments be endorsed as friendly ammendments by the mover/seconder
(Carl/Mat).
If the mover/seconder agree to adopt the
comments as friendly ammendments, I further propose we delay the ballot close
until 2PM 10 September 2004 to give the EC members to consider the
ammendments and have an opportunity to change their votes.
Please verify your vote, if I did not
record it correctly below, send me a correction note.
Regards, --Paul Nikolich Vote categories: DIS DNV APP ABS ----------------------------------------------- 01 Mat Sherman= DNV 02 Howard Frazier= DNV 03 Buzz Rigsbee= DNV 04 Bob O'Hara. DIS/comments 05 John Hawkins. APP 06 Tony Jeffree. APP 07 Bob Grow. DIS/comments 08 Stuart Kerry= DNV 09 Bob Heile= DNV 10 Roger Marks= DNV 11 Mike Takefman. APP 12 Carl Stevenson. APP 13 Steve Shellhammer. APP 14 Jerry Upton. APP 15 Ajay Rajkumar= DNV ---++++---+++++---++++--- TOTALS DIS DNV APP ABS total: -02- -07- -06- -00- Bob Grow comments:
Disapprove
1. The release confuses clear IEEE 802 branding. It
should not include any abbreviations that will confuse our standards customers
between organizational groups and standards projects. I find "task
group 802.11T" and "IEEE 802.11t Task Group" as confusing. While some
of us identify our subgroups with the project name, I don't believe that is the
case here. The project is P802.11.2 and the group driving the project is
IEEE 802.11 TG-T (or pick some other abbreviation that isn't like the name of a
project).
2. Inconsistent placement of "P". Early on, it is properly
located (IEEE P802.11.2) but toward the end it is improperly located (PIEEE
802.11.2). Correct the instances of the latter.
3. I believe the circle R is improperly used near the bottom of the
release. The committee is not a product, it is a group of people and
registration marks are only applied to products. I note that marks are not
applied to IEEE Computer Society and IEEE Standards Associations, we are no
different!
Bob O'Hara comments:
Disapprove.
I support all of Bob
Grow's comments on what is wrong with this press release, except for the use of
802.11t as the task group name. The occurrence of "802.11T" should be
replaced with "802.11t". I also agree with the comment made by Carl
Stevenson, as well, striking out specific text.
-Bob ----- Original Message -----
From: Paul
Nikolich
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:49 PM
Subject: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ENDS 3 SEPT+++authorization
of Press Release on approval of 802.11.2 (evaluation of 802.11 wless
performance) project Dear EC members,
This is a 10 day EC email ballot on the
following motion:
Motion: Approve the attached press release on the
approval of the 802.11.2 PAR for distribution.
Moved: Carl Stevenson
Second: Mat Sherman
The ballot duration will be 10 days. It
opens 2pm edt 24 August and closes 2pm edt 3 September.
Regards,
--Paul Nikolich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stevenson, Carl R (Carl)" <carlstevenson@AGERE.COM>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] mover/second for EC ballot on
Press Release on approval of 802.11.2 (evaluation of 802.11 wless performance)
project I will make the motion if the deletion marked by "strikeout" in the attached version is adopted. I think the "and inherently unstable" language could give an unfavorable impression in the press that would not be good for 802.11. I think it's sufficient to say "dynamic" and leave it at that. Regards, Carl > -----Original Message----- > From: <A ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. |