|
Paul,
Since
it takes multiple sessions to establish (and loose) membership. By
tracking how many individuals are within one meeting of gaining (or losing)
membership, we probably could build a fairly accurate filter for one meeting
out! Just a guess.
Mat
Matthew Sherman,
PhD
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com
Dear WG and TAG chairs,
I now have all the membership data. The
summary information is as follows:
| Working Group |
Number Voters |
|
|
| 802.1 |
50 |
| 802.3 |
182 |
| 802.11 |
507 |
| 802.15 |
261 |
| 802.16 |
149 |
| 802.17 |
38 |
| 802.18 |
20 |
| 802.19 |
12 |
| 802.20 |
189 |
| 802.21 |
49 |
TOTAL
1457
It is interesting to note that the total
membership is close to the actual number of plenary session attendees.
There is little correlation, I think, since many attendees do not ever become
members, and some attendees are members of multiple groups. Hmmm.
Maybe 'Membership" is a good long term averaging filter that is a good
predictor of plenary session attendance. I would be interested to hear
your opinions.
Now that we have the current data, I'm curious as
to what you think will happen to the number of your voters versus time.
If any of you are willing to estimate your voting membership size
for each plenary through the November 2005, send it to me and I collect that
information and we could use it as another estimate tool for our plenary
session attendance.
Regards,
--Paul ---------- This email is sent
from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by
Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
|