| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Bob,
Your first assumption is correct i.e. "but will simply be
providing connectivity and the safety issues will be addressed by other
standards or specifications that use the provided vehicular wireless
access". This was the sentiment of the group. Indeed IEEE groups P1609
(Layers 3 and above for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)
communications) & P1556 (security for WAVE systems) are working closely at
the upper layers with the National Public Safety Telecommunications
Council on public safety
requirements.
Therefore, to address your concerns with your good
suggestion the corrections to the paragraph 19 would read:
19. ADDITIONAL NOTES: The primary use of the amendment will be in support of surface transportation safety applications. Some examples of such applications are: intersection collision warning, stopped vehicle hazard warning, emergency vehicle approach warning, work zone warning, and road hazard warning. The standard will not address the safety issues of the cited example applications above, but will be providing connectivity where the safety issues will be addressed by other standards or specifications that use the provided vehicular wireless access.
If this is suitably accepted, then it would be added to the submitted PAR for NesCom.
Respectfully,
Stuart
_______________________________
Stuart J. Kerry Chair, IEEE 802.11 WLANs WG Philips Semiconductors, Inc. 1109 McKay Drive, M/S 48A SJ, San Jose, CA 95131-1706, United States of America. Ph : +1 (408) 474-7356 Fax : +1 (408) 474-5343 Cell: +1 (408) 348-3171 eMail: stuart.kerry@philips.com _______________________________ From: owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Grow, Bob Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:30 To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org Subject: Re: [802SEC] +++EC Email Ballot+++ ENDS 11AUG +++ motion to approve forwarding of 802.11p PAR to NesCom Comments:
1. I congratulate the study group on producing
thoughtful and detailed responses to the Five Criteria.
2. PAR item 19 -- The additional information raises a
concern as to why the provided text was not included in PAR item 18. If I
understand the nature of the project correctly, the 802.11 standard itself will
not address the safety issues of the cited possible applications (e.g.,
collision avoidance), but will simply be providing connectivity and the safety
issues will be addressed by other standards or specifications that use the
provided vehicular wireless access. If this is correct, I would recommend
addition of a sentence to this effect to the note in 19. If it is not
correct, the paragraph in 19 should be moved to the explanation field of 18 as
an appropriate red flag of the intended use of the standard.
--Bob Grow ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. |