Re: [802SEC] +++EC Motion+++ To conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to RevCom under procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P
Approve, assuming it is decided that such a ballot is still necessary,
based on the email debate.
Steve
_____________________________
Steve Shellhammer
Intel Corporation
(858) 391-4570
stephen.j.shellhammer@intel.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Paul Nikolich
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 3:13 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] +++EC Motion+++ To conditionally approve forwarding
P802.17 to RevCom under procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P
Dear EC Members,
This is a 10 day email ballot to make a determination on the following
motion. The ballot opens 6:30PM EDT 23 April 2004 and closes 6:30PM EDT
3
May 2004.
Motion: To conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to RevCom under
procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P.
Moved: Mike Takefman
Second: Bob O'Hara.
Regards,
--Paul Nikolich
Dear EC Members,
In the preceding email, I detailed the results of our
last recirculation ballot and our plan moving forward.
I therefore make the following EC email ballot motion:
Move to conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to RevCom under
procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P.
May I have a second?
cheers,
mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Takefman" <tak@CISCO.COM>
To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 1:56 PM
Subject: [802SEC] Result of 802.17 D3.2 Recirculation / Conditional
Approval
>
> Dear EC Members,
>
> On April 21, 2004 the CRG of 802.17 met to resolve comments on
> the Sponsor Ballot Recirculation of P802.17 D3.2. The recirculation
> ballot closed on April 16, 2004.
>
> I regret to inform the EC that I believe we have failed to
> meet the conditions set forth in Procedure 10. Specifically,
> (item 4) we have chosen to make some changes to the draft that do
> constitute technical changes (and are detailed below).
>
> That being said, as the volume of comments were down
> substantially from previous ballots and the operational technical
> change corrects a rather obscure corner case I will be
> requesting the EC to grant conditional approval again
> under Procedure 10 via an email ballot (to follow
> after this email).
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> P802.17 D3.2 Recirc Statistics: Ballot closed on April 16, 2004.
>
> 76 Approve 4 Disapprove 5 Abstains = 95% Affirmative
>
> No new disapprove voters:
>
> Note: One of the disapprove voters had flipped his vote via email to
> me but did not submit a new ballot. Therefore the Approval ratio
> could be as high as 96% (77/3/5).
>
> 67 comments were received from 7 commentors:
> Only 1 negative balloter submitted comments (30 comments)
>
> 30 Editorial comments
> 9 Technical Binding comments from an existing negative voter
> 28 Technical Non Binding comments from approving voters
>
> No new valid disapprove votes or comments on new issues that were
> not resolved to the satisfaction of the disapprove voter.
>
> 5 unresolved comments from a negative voter. All comments were
> against non-changebar text. 4 were restatements of issues raised
> in previous ballots, 1 was an editorial change (to reformat a
> table) marked as a technical issue.
>
> Technical/Operational Change:
> -An error was found in the protection state machine. A corner
> case/race condition that is highly unlikely to occur in a real system
> but is theoretically possible was fixed.
>
> Technical/Non Operational Change:
> -IETF review of the MIB found that a few initialization
> values / indentifiers were incorrect and caused MIB compilation
> to fail.
>
> Pseudo-Technical / Editorial Change:
> -inconsistent use of units for 1 variable. One variable was marked as
> being in micro-seconds (with its default being 1000), whereas the
other
> related variables in the same state machine used milliseconds.
> -3 changes in existing PICs statements
> -2 optional PICs statements added
> -missing references
> -other minor editorial fixes
>
>
> Moving Forward:
>
> http://www.ieee802.org/17/member/draftballots/d3_3/index.htm contains
> the latest draft and all associated documentation.
>
> Draft 3.3 and associated comments were created and forwarded to SA
Staff
> for Recirculation Ballot. Balloting started on date April 23, with
> end date May 8.
>
> Assuming that the EC grants conditional approval for 802.17 D3.3:
>
> A teleconference will be held Monday May 10th, 2004 to review comments
/
> determine if we can submit to RevCom.
>
> Recirculation ballot will be started May 13th (as appropriate).
>
> cheers,
>
> mike
>
>
> ----------
> This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This
list is maintained by Listserv.
>
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.