Re: [Fwd: [802SEC] +++ EC P&P Revision Ballot +++ on LMSC financial operations]
Bill,
I vote disapprove for the same reasons as Geoff and Tony, plus:
1) in item (1) change the first sentence "Pay for the expenses..." to "Have
a authorized accounts with sufficient funds to pay for the expenses..."
2) in item (1) change the sentence "Such costs include the costs for:" to
"Such costs include (but are not limited to) the costs for:"
I want to have some flexibility in the case we have expenses that we cannot
anticipate at this time.
Regards,
--Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Quackenbush" <quackenbush@ieee.org>
To: "Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)" <matthew.sherman@baesystems.com>
Cc: "IEEE 802 SEC" <stds-802-sec@ieee.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [802SEC] +++ EC P&P Revision Ballot +++ on LMSC financial
operations]
>
> To date, the returned ballots are as follows.
>
> Geoff Thompson - Disapprove w/ comments
>
> Carl Stevenson - Disapprove w/ commnets
>
> Tony Jeffree - Disapprove w/ commnets
>
> Regards,
>
> wlq
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Bill,
>
> I have no idea if I voted. Please provide a summary of the current tally
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mat