| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Mark,
I
certainly like this one better than the last. But, it will still require a
rules change ballot and all that entails to officially change the P&P.
I'm willing to look the other way on the one hour part of the current rule,
until the rule change is completed.
-Bob -----Original Message-----
From: Klerer Mark [mailto:M.Klerer@flarion.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:24 PM To: Bob O'Hara; Klerer Mark; stds-802-sec@ieee.org Subject: RE: [802SEC] Motion on 802 News Bulletin (Next Iteration) Bob
I am willing to go with
that. I think this will also work for Bob Grow Here is the next
attempt: Whereas the IEEE
802 News Bulletin has become a standing means by which the IEEE 802 WGs and TAGs disseminate timely
information, it is resolved that:
Bob O'Hara, if you agree to this in
principle can you give me some advice on how to make this "consistent" with the
P&P or do we need to propose a change to the
P&P. Please let me have your comments and I
will see if we are close to consensus. Mark -----Original
Message----- I
vehemently object to eliminating the closing reports from the chairs. I
would support relaxing the requirement as to when that report is required to be
provided to the secretary to the three days stated in the motion. I
believe that everything that is required to develop the PR material can be
extracted from the closing reports. I
will also ask the chair to rule this motion out of order, as it is attempting to
make a change to the P&P by a simple motion. -Bob -----Original
Message----- EC
Members, The following constitutes a revision
of the Motion dealing with the support of the IEEE 802 News
Bulletin. Attached is the reply I received
form Karen McCabe on the feasibility of working without a pre-plenary draft of
the News Bulletin. She indicates that IEEE staff is willing to work without the
pre-meeting input. Bob Grow indicated that he may be
willing to support a motion on providing input to the news within 3 days in lieu
of the status report due within one hour of the closing of a plenary
session. Based on that I would like your
comments on the following proposed motion for the closing EC meeting. I will
only present if we get a chance of passing the motion otherwise we will take it
up next time. Whereas the IEEE
802 News Bulletin has become the standing means by which the IEEE 802 WGs and
TAGs disseminate timely information, it is resolved
that: 1.
The requirement
for the WG Chair to deliver a
"Plenary Closing Status Report" to the EC secretary within an hour of the close
of the WG meeting be replaced with the following
responsibilities: 1.
The WG chair is responsible for assuring
that timely input is provided to the 802 News Bulletin coordinator to facilitate
posting of a final version of the News Bulleting one week after the closing of
each 802 plenary. To this end a
summary of the WG
accomplishments shall be provided
within three days of the close of the
Plenary session. 2.
The WG chair may
delegate this responsibility to a WG member. Please let me have your comments and
I will see if we are close to consensus. Mark |