| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
I
vehemently object to eliminating the closing reports from the chairs. I
would support relaxing the requirement as to when that report is required to be
provided to the secretary to the three days stated in the motion. I
believe that everything that is required to develop the PR material can be
extracted from the closing reports.
I will
also ask the chair to rule this motion out of order, as it is attempting to make
a change to the P&P by a simple motion.
-Bob -----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Klerer Mark Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:35 PM To: 'stds-802-sec@ieee.org' Subject: [802SEC] Motion on 802 News Bulletin EC
Members, The following constitutes a revision
of the Motion dealing with the support of the IEEE 802 News
Bulletin. Attached is the reply I received
form Karen McCabe on the feasibility of working without a pre-plenary draft of
the News Bulletin. She indicates that IEEE staff is willing to work without the
pre-meeting input. Bob Grow indicated that he may be
willing to support a motion on providing input to the news within 3 days in lieu
of the status report due within one hour of the closing of a plenary
session. Based on that I would like your
comments on the following proposed motion for the closing EC meeting. I will
only present if we get a chance of passing the motion otherwise we will take it
up next time. Whereas the IEEE
802 News Bulletin has become the standing means by which the IEEE 802 WGs and TAGs disseminate timely
information, it is resolved that: ·
The requirement
for the WG Chair to deliver a
"Plenary Closing Status Report" to the EC secretary within an hour of the close
of the WG meeting be replaced with the following
responsibilities:
Please let me have your comments and
I will see if we are close to consensus. Mark |