RE: [802SEC] LMSC deadbeats
Works for me, unless IEEE legal determines that
there could be some liability in doing so.
Carl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:billq@attglobal.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:11 PM
> To: IEEE 802 SEC
> Cc: Dawn C. Slykhouse; Jennifer Hull
> Subject: [802SEC] LMSC deadbeats
>
>
>
> Gentle people,
>
> There were about a dozen "unpaid attendees" at the July
> plenary session
> in SF. All of them have been contacted and about half of them have
> still not paid up.
>
> The amount of effort required to contact these individuals first by
> email and then with several increasingly stern letters is significant
> and in my opinion not worth the effort.
>
> Therefore I propose to introduce the policy that "unpaid attendees" of
> an LMSC session that have been contacted by email and that
> have neither
> pay up by the deadline stated in the P&P nor been determined
> to have not
> attended any portion of a LMSC technical meeting that was scheduled as
> part of the plenary session be publicly identified, along with their
> corporate affiliation, at the LMSC EC meeting and the LMSC plenary
> meeting on Monday morning. Each such individual will be notified by
> email that this identification will occur.
>
> Does anyone have a problem with such a policy?
>
> Thanks,
>
> wlq
>