RE: [802SEC] LMSC deadbeats
Bill, So we're back to reading the list of deadbeats for the prior plenary meeting.
Can we at least insure that those so identified are intentional deadbeats and not someone we were unable to contact ???
Ignorance is no excuse, but folks should at least get an option to redeem themselves. Failure to do so once informed is just grounds for rebuke.
Thanx, Buzz
Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing - SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
(425) 865-2443 Fx: (425) 865-6721
everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:billq@attglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 12:11 PM
To: IEEE 802 SEC
Cc: Dawn C. Slykhouse; Jennifer Hull
Subject: [802SEC] LMSC deadbeats
Gentle people,
There were about a dozen "unpaid attendees" at the July plenary session
in SF. All of them have been contacted and about half of them have
still not paid up.
The amount of effort required to contact these individuals first by
email and then with several increasingly stern letters is significant
and in my opinion not worth the effort.
Therefore I propose to introduce the policy that "unpaid attendees" of
an LMSC session that have been contacted by email and that have neither
pay up by the deadline stated in the P&P nor been determined to have not
attended any portion of a LMSC technical meeting that was scheduled as
part of the plenary session be publicly identified, along with their
corporate affiliation, at the LMSC EC meeting and the LMSC plenary
meeting on Monday morning. Each such individual will be notified by
email that this identification will occur.
Does anyone have a problem with such a policy?
Thanks,
wlq