Re: [802SEC] More on ArrayComm - another slide
All,
While Ms. Wilson is entitled to her opinions, slide 16 clearly implies
to me that iBurst is standards based on 802.20, and the last slide does
not, in my opinion, mitigate that implication.
Since in general it is only the printed material and/or slides, not the
words that were spoken, that survive a seminar/workshop/etc. in recorded
form, the accuracy of those printed materials and slides is of primary importance.
Thanks,
wlq
"Stevenson, Carl R (Carl)" wrote:
>
> Ms. Wilson has accused me of "attacking her personally" by "taking the slide (I sent from her presentation) out of context."
>
> Her response to my sending what I considered to be text making inaccurate claims to the EC has been to threaten to complain to my employer. My position is that as a member of the EC, I have a fiduciary-like duty to 802, even though this matter does not directly involve funds.
>
> She stated the view that the last statement on the last slide of her presentation mitigates what I (and apparently others) believe to be inaccurate claims as to ArrayComm's technology being "... standards-based (IEEE 802.20) ..."
>
> In the interest of fairness, I am attaching the last slide from her presentation with the closing statement that she believes mitigates the text from slide 16 that I sent earlier.
>
> I disagree with her assertion that that either or both the last statement on the last slide and her verbal "clairification" in response to my question during the Q&A following her presentation "cures all ills" ... and I have told her that that is my personal view.
>
> Regards,
> Carl
> <<ArrayComm_last_slide_CITEL.ppt>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: ArrayComm_last_slide_CITEL.ppt
> ArrayComm_last_slide_CITEL.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint
> Encoding: base64
> Description: ArrayComm_last_slide_CITEL.ppt