RE: [802SEC] ArrayComm claiming their technology to be "Standards-Based (IEEE 802.20)" in CITEL Seminar presentation
Mat,
I agree ... that is why I raised the issue. The claim
is patently self-serving and inaccurate. The presenter
has indicated an unwillingness to change the document
to correct the obvious falsehood.
I am open to direction from the EC (the conference is
only this week, so the window of opportunity to get
any remediation is limited).
Carl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mjsherman@research.att.com [mailto:mjsherman@research.att.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 10:41 PM
> To: Stevenson, Carl R (Carl); stds-802-sec@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: [802SEC] ArrayComm claiming their technology to be
> "Standards-Based (IEEE 802.20)" in CITEL Seminar presentation
>
>
> Carl,
>
> If the slide (as shown) goes home in the package, and no
> action is taken
> by the presenter to correct it, I think I agree that some
> action should
> be taken.
>
> Mat
>
> Matthew Sherman
> Vice Chair, IEEE 802
> Technology Consultant
> Communications Technology Research
> AT&T Labs - Shannon Laboratory
> Room B255, Building 103
> 180 Park Avenue
> P.O. Box 971
> Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971
> Phone: +1 (973) 236-6925
> Fax: +1 (973) 360-5877
> EMAIL: mjsherman@att.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stevenson, Carl R (Carl) [mailto:carlstevenson@agere.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 7:02 PM
> To: stds-802-sec@ieee.org
> Subject: [802SEC] ArrayComm claiming their technology to be
> "Standards-Based (IEEE 802.20)" in CITEL Seminar presentation
> Importance: High
>
> Dear EC Members,
>
> I have a real problem with the presentation made by Joanne Wilson of
> ArrayComm (a member of 802.20) at the CITEL Broadband Seminar today in
> El Salvador.
>
> The offending slide claims that ArrayComm's "iBurst" is "Proven
> technology, standards-based (IEEE 802.20), multiple large
> manufacturers"
> ... and THAT
> is what attendees will be taking home and presumably distributing to
> their colleagues.
>
> I also mention that IEEE trademarks, if any, on IEEE 802.20 are not
> honored in ArrayComm's slides.
>
> I did question Ms. Wilson in the Q&A session following the
> presentations
> and got her to verbally clarify that, while ArrayComm may
> intend to make
> a proposal in
> 802.20, that their "iBurst" technology is NOT "802.20" nor is it even
> certain in any way to become a part of the yet-to-be-defined 802.20
> standard. However, the
> slide will still go home with people and when they review it
> or share it
> with colleagues the misimpression will be reinforced.
>
> Ms. Wilson's response when confronted privately with the
> attached slide
> was "It's done, I clarified, and I'm not going to change the
> slide now."
>
> I bring this to the attention of the EC because I believe this
> misrepresentation in ArrayComm's presentation to the CITEL
> community is
> totally inappropriate and I
> am interested in what possible action the EC and/or IEEE
> can/will take.
>
> I am only sending the egregious slide at this time, as the entire
> presentation is about 7 MB.
>
>
> Regards,
> Carl R. Stevenson
> Chair, IEEE 802.18 Radio Regulatory Technical Advisory Group
> 610-965-8799 (home office)
> 610-712-3217 (fax mailbox)
> 610-570-6168 (cellphone)
> Short Message Service: 6105706168@voicestream.net
> carl.stevenson@ieee.org
>
> <<ArrayComm_slide16_CITEL.ppt>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>