Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++SEC MOTION+++ Motion: Authorize Forwarding of the 802.11g draft to RevCom




APPROVE.

wlq

> Paul Nikolich wrote:
> 
> Dear SEC members,
> 
> This is a 15 day SEC email ballot to make a determination by an SEC
> motion to authorize forwarding 802.11g Draft 8.2 to RevCom.
> 
> Moved by Stuart J. Kerry
> Seconded by Bob Heile
> 
> The email ballot opens on Wednesday May 21st, 2003 10PM ET and closes
> Thursday June 5th, 2003 10PM ET.
> 
> Please direct your responses to the SEC reflector with a CC directly
> to me (p.nikolich@ieee.org).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> - Paul Nikolich
> 
> SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DOCUMENTATION Below:
> 
> +++++++++
> 
> LAST SPONSOR BALLOT RESULTS:
> 
> Ballot: P802.11g/D8.2 2nd IEEE Recirculation Ballot which Closed
> 2003-05-14, and obtained a 95% approval.
> 
> This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement.
> 96 eligible people in this ballot group.
> 64 affirmative votes
> 3 negative votes with comments
> 0 negative votes without comments
> 10 abstention votes
> =====
> 77 votes received = 80% returned
> 12% abstention
> 
> The 75% affirmation requirement is being met.
> 64 affirmative votes
> 3 negative votes with comments
> =====
> 67 votes = 95% affirmative
> 
> +++++++++
> 
> RESULTS OF TASK GROUP G AND 802.11 WG MOTIONS at DALLAS 802.11 session
> (May 2003):
> 
> Move to Forward IEEE 802.11g Draft 8.2 to the IEEE 802 SEC and to
> RevCom for Final Approval
> 
> Task Group G: 26 / 0 / 0
> 802.11 WG: 102 / 0 / 2
> 
> +++++++++
> 
> SUMMARY OF REMAINING VOTERS ISSUES:
> 
>         Attached is a summary of status of the three "no" voters
> (O'Farrell, Moreton, Gilb) and the one new "yes" with comments voter
> (Monteban).
> 
> Tim O'Farrell, Supergold
> 
>         Tim voted NO on the first Sponsor Ballot, i.e. Draft 6.1 of
> IEEE 802.11g.  We have not been able to contact him sense.  E-mails
> were sent on both recirculation ballots requesting his response.  At
> the April 2003 session of 802.11g, multiple attempts were made to
> contact Tim to no avail.  On the first recirculation ballot, Tim
> provided five comments.  One comments was editorial, and it was
> accepted.  The other four comments were technical.  Tim had two
> comments related to removing optional functionality, which were both
> rejected.  Tim also had two comments related to ACR which were both
> rejected.
> 
> -        Summary for Tim O'Farrell
> o        Voted "No" on first sponsor ballot
> o        Has not voted on last of the recirculation ballots
> o        Attempts at contact have failed
> 
> Mike Moreton, Synad
> 
>         Mike voted NO WITH COMMENTS on Draft 8.2.  All of Mike
> comments were editorial.  Mike currently maintains his NO vote based
> on previously circulated comments.
> 
> -        Summary for Mike Moreton
> o        Voted "No" on Draft 8.2 based on previously submitted
> technical comments
> o        Submitted no new technical comments on Draft 8.2
> o        Submitted 7 editorial comments
> o        All editorial comments were rejected
> 
> James Gilb, Appairent
> 
>         James also voted NO WITH COMMENTS on Draft 8.2.  All of James
> comments have previously been circulated.  James maintains his NO vote
> base on previously circulated comments.
> 
> -        Summary for James Gilb
> o        Voted "No" on Draft 8.2
> o        Submitted 14 technical and editorial comments on Draft 8.2
> o        None of the technical comments are new
> o        All comments were rejected
> 
> Leo Monteban, Agere
> 
>         Leo voted YES WITH COMMENTS on Draft 8.2.  Leo submitted two
> editorial comments.  Both editorial comments were found to be
> non-substantive by IEEE 802.11 Task Group G, thus both were rejected.
> 
> -        Summary for Leo Monteban
> o        Cast a "Yes" vote with two comments
> o        Both comments were editorial
> o        Both comments were rejected
> 
> +++++++++
> 
> All Comment Resolutions are included in Doc#: 11-03-381 rev.7 as
> posted to the 802.11 web site, which contains all the comments from
> the recirculation of Draft 8.2. . A copy of which is attached for you
> convenience.  The document also contains Tim O'Farrell's comment from
> the first sponsor ballot and Mike Moreton's and James Gilb's comments
> from the first ballot.
> 
> As there were no new no votes or comments and no subsequent change was
> made to the 802.11g Draft 8.2, this ballot is concluded and D8.2 and
> supporting documentation will be forwarded to RevCom for action at the
> upcoming meeting in June.
> 
> / Stuart
> _______________________________
> 
> Stuart J. Kerry
> Chair, IEEE 802.11 WLANs WG
> 
> Philips Semiconductors, Inc.
> 1109 McKay Drive, M/S 48A SJ,
> San Jose, CA 95131-1706,
> United States of America.
> 
> Ph  : +1 (408) 474-7356
> Fax: +1 (408) 474-7247
> Cell: +1 (408) 348-3171
> eMail: stuart.kerry@philips.com
> _______________________________
> 
>                        Name: 11g comments.xls
>    11g comments.xls    Type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet
>                              (application/vnd.ms-excel)
>                    Encoding: base64