Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802SEC] +++SEC MOTION+++ Motion: Authorize Forwarding of the 802.11g draft to RevCom



Approve.
 
Carl
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Nikolich [mailto:paul.nikolich@att.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 9:32 PM
To: IEEE802
Subject: [802SEC] +++SEC MOTION+++ Motion: Authorize Forwarding of the 802.11g draft to RevCom

Dear SEC members,

This is a 15 day SEC email ballot to make a determination by an SEC motion to authorize forwarding 802.11g Draft 8.2 to RevCom.  

Moved by Stuart J. Kerry
Seconded by Bob Heile

The email ballot opens on Wednesday May 21st, 2003 10PM ET and closes Thursday June 5th, 2003 10PM ET.

Please direct your responses to the SEC reflector with a CC directly to me (p.nikolich@ieee.org).

Regards,

- Paul Nikolich

SUPPORTING INFORMATION / DOCUMENTATION Below:

+++++++++

LAST SPONSOR BALLOT RESULTS:

Ballot: P802.11g/D8.2 2nd IEEE Recirculation Ballot which Closed 2003-05-14, and obtained a 95% approval.

This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement.
96 eligible people in this ballot group.
64 affirmative votes
3 negative votes with comments
0 negative votes without comments
10 abstention votes
=====
77 votes received = 80% returned
12% abstention

The 75% affirmation requirement is being met.
64 affirmative votes
3 negative votes with comments
=====
67 votes = 95% affirmative

+++++++++

RESULTS OF TASK GROUP G AND 802.11 WG MOTIONS at DALLAS 802.11 session (May 2003):

Move to Forward IEEE 802.11g Draft 8.2 to the IEEE 802 SEC and to RevCom for Final Approval

Task Group G: 26 / 0 / 0
802.11 WG: 102 / 0 / 2

+++++++++

SUMMARY OF REMAINING VOTERS ISSUES:

        Attached is a summary of status of the three "no" voters (O'Farrell, Moreton, Gilb) and the one new "yes" with comments voter (Monteban).

Tim O'Farrell, Supergold

        Tim voted NO on the first Sponsor Ballot, i.e. Draft 6.1 of IEEE 802.11g.  We have not been able to contact him sense.  E-mails were sent on both recirculation ballots requesting his response.  At the April 2003 session of 802.11g, multiple attempts were made to contact Tim to no avail.  On the first recirculation ballot, Tim provided five comments.  One comments was editorial, and it was accepted.  The other four comments were technical.  Tim had two comments related to removing optional functionality, which were both rejected.  Tim also had two comments related to ACR which were both rejected.

-        Summary for Tim O'Farrell
o        Voted "No" on first sponsor ballot
o        Has not voted on last of the recirculation ballots
o        Attempts at contact have failed

Mike Moreton, Synad

        Mike voted NO WITH COMMENTS on Draft 8.2.  All of Mike comments were editorial.  Mike currently maintains his NO vote based on previously circulated comments.  

-        Summary for Mike Moreton
o        Voted "No" on Draft 8.2 based on previously submitted technical comments
o        Submitted no new technical comments on Draft 8.2
o        Submitted 7 editorial comments
o        All editorial comments were rejected

James Gilb, Appairent

        James also voted NO WITH COMMENTS on Draft 8.2.  All of James comments have previously been circulated.  James maintains his NO vote base on previously circulated comments.

-        Summary for James Gilb
o        Voted "No" on Draft 8.2
o        Submitted 14 technical and editorial comments on Draft 8.2
o        None of the technical comments are new
o        All comments were rejected

Leo Monteban, Agere        

        Leo voted YES WITH COMMENTS on Draft 8.2.  Leo submitted two editorial comments.  Both editorial comments were found to be non-substantive by IEEE 802.11 Task Group G, thus both were rejected.

-        Summary for Leo Monteban
o        Cast a "Yes" vote with two comments
o        Both comments were editorial
o        Both comments were rejected

+++++++++

All Comment Resolutions are included in Doc#: 11-03-381 rev.7 as posted to the 802.11 web site, which contains all the comments from the recirculation of Draft 8.2. . A copy of which is attached for you convenience.  The document also contains Tim O'Farrell's comment from the first sponsor ballot and Mike Moreton's and James Gilb's comments from the first ballot.



As there were no new no votes or comments and no subsequent change was made to the 802.11g Draft 8.2, this ballot is concluded and D8.2 and supporting documentation will be forwarded to RevCom for action at the upcoming meeting in June.

/ Stuart
_______________________________

Stuart J. Kerry
Chair, IEEE 802.11 WLANs WG

Philips Semiconductors, Inc.
1109 McKay Drive, M/S 48A SJ,
San Jose, CA 95131-1706,
United States of America.

Ph  : +1 (408) 474-7356
Fax: +1 (408) 474-7247
Cell: +1 (408) 348-3171
eMail: stuart.kerry@philips.com
_______________________________