[802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom

["Paul Nikolich" <paul.nikolich@att.net>]

Dear SEC,

This is a 14 day SEC email ballot to make a determination on the below SEC motion to authorize forwarding 802.15.2 D9 to RevCom. 

Moved by Bob Heile, Seconded by Stuart Kerry

The email ballot opens on Thursday April 17, 2003 6:30PM EDT and closes Thursday May 1, 2003 6:30PM EDT.

Please direct your responses to the SEC reflector with a CC directly to me (p.nikolich@ieee.org).

Regards,

--Paul Nikolich



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Heile" <bheile@ieee.org>
To: <p.nikolich@ieee.org>
Cc: <stuart@ok-brit.com>; <Stuart.Kerry@philips.com>; <shell@symbol.com>;
<david.cypher@nist.gov>; "bob Heile" <bheile@ieee.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 7:08 AM
Subject: Move to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom


> Paul
>
> I would like to start a 10 day SEC email Letter Ballot.
>
> Having successfully completed Sponsor Ballot, Move to Forward 802.15.2
> Draft 9 to RevCom.
>
> Supporting documentation has been issued in previous emails to the SEC.
>
> moved:  Bob Heile
> second:  Stuart Kerry
>
>
> Bob Heile, Ph.D
> Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
> Chair, ZigBee Alliance
> 11 Louis Road
> Attleboro, MA  02703   USA
> Phone: 508-222-1393
> Mobile: 781-929-4832
> Fax:     508-222-0515
> email:   bheile@ieee.org
>

Supporting Documentation:

----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Heile
To: stds-802-sec@ieee.org
Cc: shell@symbol.com ; david.cypher@nist.gov
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: [802SEC] Report on 15.2 Recirculation Ballot


The 15.2 Recirculation ballot closed on April 15. The results were:

1. This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement.
66 eligible people in this ballot group.
48 affirmative votes
1 negative votes with comments
0 negative votes without comments
7 abstention votes
=====
56 votes received = 84% returned
12% abstention
2. The 75% affirmation requirement is being met.
48 affirmative votes
1 negative votes with comments
=====
49 votes = 97% affirmative

We received one new affirmative and one of the no voters changed their vote
to affirmative.  The one remaining no vote was from the previous ballot and
was ruled then as not a valid technical comment and made part of the
recirculation. (copy below) There has been no response from that voter.

Given that there are no new no votes and no changes required to the draft,
I will be making a motion to the SEC, via a 10 day letter ballot,  to
forward Draft 9 to RevCom in time for the May 2 submission deadline.


Comment received on Draft 8 and recirculated with Draft 9:

CommenterName CommentType CommentID Clause Subclause Page Line
O'Farrell, Timothy      T               8               D       89
Comment
The source code of Appendix D is provided without a flow diagram schematic.
To enhance understanding and accessibility of the program material a flow
diagram schematic is required.
SuggestedRemedy
Include a flow diagram schematic of the source code presented in Appendix D.
Response
REJECT.
The BRC does not know of any requirements to supply a flow diagram for code,
therefore one will not be created and included. BRC does not consider this a
technical comment on the draft, since it relates to a informative annex.