Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Rule change needed ;-)

To: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: Rule change needed ;-)
From: Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 09:34:08 +0100
Cc: stds-802-sec@ieee.org
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20001026004941.00a69a60@zsc4c012.corpwest.baynetworks.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001025090604.00c7ee70@mail.expressoweb.co.uk>
Sender: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org


At 00:50 26/10/00 -0700, Geoff Thompson wrote:
>Tony
>
>
>At 09:09 AM 10/25/00 +0100, Tony Jeffree wrote:
>
>>You may be interested to know that our current operating rules require us 
>>to pass all Email ballots.  I quote from 3.4.2.1:
>>
>>"A majority of eligible voting SEC members must vote approve in order for 
>>the ballot to pass."
>
>Is that in alphabetical order?

What other order would you propose? ;-)

Regards,
Tony


>>Looks like our motion on cookies is in good shape, Geoff ;-)
>>
>>Regards,
>>Tony
>
>Geoff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rule change needed ;-)
  - From: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>

References:
- Rule change needed ;-)
  - From: Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
- Re: Rule change needed ;-)
  - From: "Geoff Thompson" <gthompso@nortelnetworks.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Rule change needed ;-)
Next by Date: Re: Rule change needed ;-)
Prev by thread: Re: Rule change needed ;-)
Next by thread: Re: Rule change needed ;-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread