RE: IEEE 802 Rules Change Ballot--Elimination of Friday Plenary Meeting
Dave, Unfortunately, I don't think that is the plan at least as it has
been discussed so far. The proposal was that the WG's still complete
their work by Thursday afternoon but that the SEC meeting gets moved
to Friday AM so that SEC members have more time to prepare for
the meeting. Whether some WGs might want to schedule
additional working sessions for Thursday PM or Friday that would
retain the room block has not been discussed (at least not with me!).
So I'll pose the question: Does anyone see merit in this suggestion ???.
Thanx, Buzz
Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
ph: (425) 865-2443, fx: (425) 865-6721
email: everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
> ----------
> From: David Carlson[SMTP:dcarlson@netlabs.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 10:38 AM
> To: Rigsbee, Everett O; Paul Nikolich; Tony Jeffree
> Cc: stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: IEEE 802 Rules Change Ballot--Elimination of Friday Plenary Meeting
> Buzz et al,
> With the elimination of the Closing Plenary, the WGs can then meet thru
> Friday instead of just thru Thursday, as was the case when a Closing Plenary
> was in vogue. This would satisfy your concern about room blocks, right?
> Dave
> From: Rigsbee, Everett O <Everett.Rigsbee@PSS.Boeing.com>
> To: Paul Nikolich <p.nikolich@ieee.org>; Tony Jeffree <tony@jeffree.co.uk>
> Cc: stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org <stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org>
> Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 12:50 PM
> Subject: RE: IEEE 802 Rules Change Ballot--Elimination of Friday Plenary Meeting
> >Tony & other SEC members:
> >Where I certainly support the move to eliminate the Friday Closing
> >Plenary, I'm holding off on sending out the notification until I've had
> >a chance to make sure that resulting room block adjustment is acceptable
> >to our contracted venues and will not cause us to incur stiff penalties
> >for undershoot. So far we look OK, but you really need to get an official
> >OK from each property. If we hit a snag short-term, I may want to recommend
> >adjusting the effectivity date to avoid a problem. Further out we're
> >definitely OK. Sorry for the delay but I was away on a much needed vacation
> >and am only just now getting back up to speed. I'll keep you posted on
> >the progress of negotiations and the message will go out as soon as
> >we are in the clear.
> >Thanx, Buzz
> >Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
> >Boeing SSG
> >PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
> >Seattle, WA 98124-2207
> >ph: (425) 865-2443, fx: (425) 865-6721
> >email: everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
> >> ----------
> >> From: Tony Jeffree[SMTP:tony@jeffree.co.uk]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 3:43 AM
> >> To: Paul Nikolich
> >> Cc: stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org
> >> Subject: Re: IEEE 802 Rules Change Ballot--Elimination of Friday Plenary
> Meeting
> >>
> >> At 10:29 15/04/00 -0400, Paul Nikolich wrote:
> >> >Dear SEC,
> >> >Per Geoff Thompson's excellent suggestion, attached you will find
> proposed
> >> >text for the IEEE Rules change to eliminate the Friday plenary meeting
> (Bob
> >> >Grow thanks for providing the edits) INCLUDING the strikethrough of
> removed
> >> >text attached.
> >> >The ballot opened April 14th 5pm EDT and closes June 1st 5pm EDT.
> >> >Howard, can you please place this rules change on the www.ieee802.org
> web
> >> >site in the IEEE 802 Opertating Rules and Other Documents subsection
> under
> >> >the heading "Proposed Rules Change".
> >> >Buzz, per our rules, rules change ballots are to be distributed to all
> 802
> >> >attendees--please notify the 802 list that a rules change is pending and
> >> >they can go to "http://www.ieee802.org/devdocs.html" and click on
> "Proposed
> >> >Rules Change" to obtain the text.
> >> Paul/Buzz - I haven't seen any notification distributed to all of 802
> yet -
> >> did I just miss it?
> >> Regards,
> >> Tony
> >>
> >
>