RE: SEC Rules Change Ballot--waiting for: Carlo, Frazier, Grow, Rigsbee, Lidinsky, Benson
Paul, I think at this point it's pretty obvious that this ballot is going to FAIL.
But I will add my DISAPPROVE to the list if you think it will make any difference.
My comments have already been put forward by the other voters so I won't
re-iterate them again. It's should be obvious that this proposal needs some
major work before it can be adopted.
Thanx, Buzz
Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
ph: (425) 865-2443, fx: (425) 865-6721
email: everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com
> ----------
> From: Paul Nikolich[SMTP:p.nikolich@ieee.org]
> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2000 8:53 AM
> To: stds-802-sec@ieee.org
> Subject: SEC Rules Change Ballot--waiting for: Carlo, Frazier, Grow, Rigsbee, Lidinsky, Benson
> Dear SEC,
> The good news: we picked up a few votes this week.
> The bad news: 6 SEC members still haven't voted.
> The results of the Nov. 99 rules change ballot (so far) are 7DIS, 6DNV:
> Jim Carlo - DNV
> Paul Nikolich - DIS
> Howard Frazier - DNV
> Bob Grow - DNV
> Buzz Rigsbee - DNV
> Bill Lidinsky - DNV
> Geoff Thompson - DIS
> Bob Love - DIS
> Chip Benson - DNV
> Vic Hayes - DIS
> Robert Russell - DIS
> Bob Heile - DIS
> Roger Marks - DIS
> For those that 'voted' by sending comments in without EXPLICITLY casting a
> vote (APP, DIS, ABS), I assumed the ballot was a DIS. If this is
> incorrect, please send a note to have correct the ballot recorded.
> For those that DNV (did not vote), remember under the rules change rules,
> not voting equals abstain equals DISAPPROVE.
> Regards,
> --Paul
> Previous message sent 2/20
> Altough I appreciate Bill's attempt to improve the accuracy and precision
> of this part of the rules, I vote Disapprove on this rules change--mainly
> because it buries the original intent of the change and became too complicated.
> Remember, the original intent (going back to Nov. 1998!) of this rules
> change was to SIMPLY reduce the turn around time for letter ballots and
> recirculation ballots (to 35 and 15 days from 40 and 20 respectively) to
> account for the lower latency of electronic balloting.
> All the other text has been introduced as a result of a secondary issue;
> clarifying the definition and constraints of voting at meetings versus letter ballots.
> Given the pace of technology development in our industry, the pressure
> improve the speed of the standards development process has increased.
> Hence we need to reduce the turn around time of our ballots (while
> maintaining high quality) immediately. I suggest we decouple the reduction
> of ballot turn around time from the other issues and focus on changing only
> that part of the rule.
> Furthermore, I suggest we reduce letter ballot time to 30 days and
> recirculation ballot time to 10 days.
> Regards,
> --Paul Nikolich
> At 12:10 PM 2/20/00 -0500, Paul Nikolich wrote:
> >All,
> >
> >Many of us are delinquent (myself included) in casting our votes on the
> >rules change ballot issued by Bill Lidinsky in November (see below).
> >
> >Please review the suggested rules change and cast your ballot immediately.
> >
> >The following members of the SEC have already voted: Bob Love (dis), Roger
> >Marks (dis), Geoff Thompson (dis)--everybody else, please vote!!!
> >
> >--Paul
> >
> >>Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 04:05:17 -0600
> >>From: Bill Lidinsky <lidinsky@hep.net>
> >>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; U)
> >>X-Accept-Language: en
> >>To: stds-802-sec@ieee.org
> >>Subject: +++ SEC Rules Change Ballot
> >>Sender: owner-stds-802-sec@ieee.org
> >>X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org>
> >>X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to majordomo@majordomo.ieee.org
> >>X-Moderator-Address: stds-802-sec-approval@majordomo.ieee.org
> >>
> >>
> >>At the SEC meeting in Kauai on Thursday 11 November 1999 the SEC
> >>approved submitting this IEEE 802 Operating Rules change to ballot.>
> >>
> >>The proposed Rules Change deals with changes to the process for voting
> >>procedures for a Working Group on procedural issues and technical
> >>issues at 802 Plenaries, interim Working Group meetings, and in
> >>between Plenary meetings. The changes involve the following sections:
> >>
> >>5.1.4.1 Chair's Function
> >>5.1.4.2 Voting on Technical Issues
> >>
> >>In addition there are minor changes to two other sections so that they
> >>refer to the above two sections correctly. These two other sections
> >>are:
> >>
> >>3.6.1 Initiation of Proposed Rules Changes
> >>5.1.3.4 Rights
> >>
> >>Attached is a pdf file showing the relevant clauses of the latest P802
> >>Operating Rules (November 1998) with the changes indicated.
> >>Strikethrough text is deleted. Underlined text is added. All other
> >>text is as it exists in the current rules document. This text was
> >>presented and discussed at a P802 Operating Rules meeting on Sunday
> >>night, 7 November 1999 in Kauai at the beginning of the 802 Plenary.
> >>It was further iterated upon during the week of the plenary. This
> >>proposed rule change represents the output of this process.
> >>
> >>This ballot opens on 12 November 1999. It will close 30 days before
> >>beginning of the March 802 plenary (Friday 4 February 2000).
> >>
> >>For your reference the current 802 rules URL is
> >>
> >> "http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/devdocs.html"
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote early and often,
> >>
> >> Bill Lidinsky, 802.1 Chair
> >> lidinsky@hep.net
> >> 630-840-8067
> >>
> >>
> >Attachment Converted: "c:\My
> Documents\Documents\Email_temp_storage\ProposedRuleChangeTry5forBallot1.doc"
> >
> >
>
>
>
- Prev by Date:
PARs for Consideration in March
- Next by Date:
RE: SEC Rules Change Ballot--waiting for: Carlo, Frazier, Grow, Rigsbee, Lidinsky, Benson
- Prev by thread:
RE: SEC Rules Change Ballot--waiting for: Carlo, Frazier, Grow, Rigsbee, Lidinsky, Benson
- Next by thread:
+++Ballot on Purchase of Two LCD Projectors
- Index(es):