Re: +++PROPOSED RULE CHANGE LETTER BALLOT
I support Bob's change
At 11:46 AM 9/30/99 -0400, rdlove@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
>
>
>I have a concern with the wording in 5.1.4.2.2 which states "A quorum is
>required at other Working Group meetings or in between meetings."
>
>Surely, a quorum is required to conduct certain business, but the present
>wording could be mis-interpreted to indicate the meeting itself is out of
order
>if no quorum exists.
>
>I propose an editorial change of the sentence to capture the following
spirit:
> A quorum is required at other Working Group meetings or in between
meetings
>to conduct working group votes.
>
>Is there support for this change, and is there concensus that what I am
>proposing is only an editorial change to the wording in the changes now being
>balloted?
>
>Best regards.
>
>Robert D. Love
>Program Manager, IBM ACS - US
>Chair IEEE 802.5 Token Ring Working Group
>IBM
>500 Park Offices Phone: 919 543-2746
>P. O. Box 12195 CNPA/656 Fax: 419 715-0359
>Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA E-Mail: rdlove@us.ibm.com
>
>
|=========================================|
| Geoffrey O. Thompson |
| Chair IEEE 802.3 |
| Nortel Networks, Inc. M/S SC5-02 |
| 4401 Great America Parkway |
| P. O. Box 58185 |
| Santa Clara, CA 95052-8185 USA |
| Phone: +1 408 495 1339 |
| Fax: +1 408 988 5525 |
| E-Mail: gthompso@nortelnetworks.com |
| Please see the IEEE 802.3 web page at |
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/index.html