Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: +++ SEC BALLOT #1 ON FCC SUBMISION (WBFH)

To: stds-802-sec@ieee.org
Subject: Re: +++ SEC BALLOT #1 ON FCC SUBMISION (WBFH)
From: "Roger B. Marks" <marks@boulder.nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:11:21 -0600
Delivered-To: fixup-stds-802-sec@ieee.org@fixme
In-Reply-To: <37F0E0CB.DEEF4BC0@megaxess.com>
References: <016e01bf09c0$653e0f40$f7d3fea9@jtcarlo><37F0E0CB.DEEF4BC0@megaxess.com>
Sender: owner-stds-802-sec@majordomo.ieee.org


At 11:37 AM -0400 99/09/28, drvaman wrote:

>I have read the letter and the contents. I would like to express significant interest in favoring the increase of frequency
>hopping channels that would facilitate higher data rate.
>
>Therefore, I support the verdict of IEEE 802.11 WG members. I would like to vote "YES" to this ballot.

With all due respect, I do not believe that this letter supports "the increase of frequency hopping channels that would facilitate higher data rate." Instead, it expresses "opposition to the proposed rule changes which would allow wider
channels for Frequency Hopping Spread spectrum (FHSS) systems."

Roger

References:
- +++ SEC BALLOT #1 ON FCC SUBMISION (WBFH)
  - From: "Jim Carlo" <jcarlo@ti.com>
- Re: +++ SEC BALLOT #1 ON FCC SUBMISION (WBFH)
  - From: drvaman <drvaman@megaxess.com>

Prev by Date: Fw: +++ SEC BALLOT #2 ON FCC SUBMISION (DS Test)
Next by Date: Re: +++ SEC BALLOT #2 ON FCC SUBMISION (DS Test)
Prev by thread: Re: +++ SEC BALLOT #1 ON FCC SUBMISION (WBFH)
Next by thread: Re: +++ SEC BALLOT #1 ON FCC SUBMISION (WBFH)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread